|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Information is accurate & comprehensive (key elements included)
*Show knowledge of topic *Made a complete analysis of the information and issues |
*Information is accurate
*key elements inadequate *Limited information *Acceptable job of research
|
*Unacceptable job of research
*Key elements missing *Limited or not fact gathering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Uses logical format
*Transitions from idea to idea were excellent, enhancing the project |
*Sequencing is inconsistent
*Transitions not always smooth, at times distract the audience |
*Difficult to follow
*Transitions were abrupt and distracted audience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Organizational structure is clear and coherent
*Grammar and usage are correct *Spelling is correct |
*Long or incomplete paragraphs
*Minor problems with grammar and usage *Spelling is usually correct |
*Paragraph structure is missing
*Errors in grammar, or usage are evident *Frequent spelling errors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Original, unique approach
*Engaging, provocative, interesting way to explain topic. |
*Few original touches
*Somewhat interesting |
*bland approach of topic
*Do not keep audience interested |